Talk:10001th prime

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 08:45, 7 December 2021 by Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→‎Title: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Apart from this task being duplicated a gazillion times where the 10001st prime or greater is required, note that correct is "10001st". See https://projecteuler.net/problem=7. --Nigel Galloway (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Title

Shouldn't it be 10001st or, more generaj, nth prime. Show output for n=10001! ..Walter Pachl 08:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)