Talk:10001th prime: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Apart from this task being duplicated a gazillion times where the 10001st prime or greater is required, note that correct is "10001st". See [https://projecteuler.net/problem=7...")
 
(→‎Title: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Apart from this task being duplicated a gazillion times where the 10001st prime or greater is required, note that correct is "10001st". See [https://projecteuler.net/problem=7 https://projecteuler.net/problem=7]. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Apart from this task being duplicated a gazillion times where the 10001st prime or greater is required, note that correct is "10001st". See [https://projecteuler.net/problem=7 https://projecteuler.net/problem=7]. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

== Title ==

Shouldn't it be 10001st
or, more generaj, nth prime. Show output for n=10001! ..Walter Pachl 08:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:45, 7 December 2021

Apart from this task being duplicated a gazillion times where the 10001st prime or greater is required, note that correct is "10001st". See https://projecteuler.net/problem=7. --Nigel Galloway (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Title

Shouldn't it be 10001st or, more generaj, nth prime. Show output for n=10001! ..Walter Pachl 08:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)