Talk:Rosetta Code/Count examples: Difference between revisions
→Show which languages don't implement a task: More coverage
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Show which languages don't implement a task: I don't disagree but wouldn't hold my breath) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Show which languages don't implement a task: More coverage) |
||
Line 56:
:I'll fiddle around with it to see if I can come up with something useful, but I wouldn't hold my breath. If there was some way to hook into the database directly so I didn't need to do so many page requests it would be more feasible. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 22:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
: Well, it's not great but at least there is significantly more coverage. Now generating reports for the top 40 language in groups of 10. See [[Rosetta_Code/Count_examples/Full_list|Top tier]], [[Rosetta_Code/Count_examples/Full_list/Tier_2|Second tier]], [[Rosetta_Code/Count_examples/Full_list/Tier_3|Third tier]], [[Rosetta_Code/Count_examples/Full_list/Tier_4|Fourth tier]]. The updated code as it stands can do up to 50 languages, and could easily be modified to do more just by increasing the <code>@places</code> identifier array. I don't much see the point right now though. The 40th language has less than 45% task completion coverage so just picking a task at random from the [[:Category:Programming_Tasks|Tasks]] page will likely be one not implemented. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 17:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||