Jump to content

Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions

m
→‎REXX: typos
(→‎REXX: my error??)
m (→‎REXX: typos)
Line 182:
(Especially for examples that no longer exist!)   Getting repeatable results is problematic.   Also, not knowing what hardware and/or operating system and/or which compiler/interpreter (or version) was used, or for that matter, what ''code'' (program statements) were used,   etc,   makes it difficult to judge the veracity of the timings. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 
:: You could have said: "thanks for making me improve my code (significantly) no matter what hardware is used." But he who exüectsexpects nothing shall not be disappointed. The example still exists in rosettacode'as history. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 11:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 
There seems to be an error in the REXX code. Applying the program to a very small dictionary
2,295

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.