Revision as of 15:53, 22 April 2010 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (bytecode vs. interpeted?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:54, 22 April 2010 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) m (signed →‎bytecode and interpreted) Newer edit →
Line 2: I have added both "bytecode" and "interpreted" execution models to J. This is because bytecode is the available category which best describes how tacit code is represented, and interpreted is the available category which best describes how explicit code is represented in J602 (and, presumably, the upcoming versions). --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 15:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC) == Is J esoteric? ==

Category talk:J (view source)