Revision as of 14:33, 1 February 2023 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:20, 2 February 2023 (view source) PureFox (talk \| contribs) (Responded to Nigel.) Newer edit →
Line 12: ::: Suggesting a task Ormiston triplets? Perhaps a new OEIS sequence? In this age of artificial intelligence perhaps rc requires a bot which checks OEIS daily and autonomously generates an rc task for each new sequence. I read somewhere that the number of sequences on OEIS increases by about 40 a day, so that should keep everyone busy.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 14:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC) ::::Good idea re Ormiston triples. I've just posted a new task for that. ::::Although there are a lot of existing OEIS sequences with new ones being added every day, most of them are too trivial or otherwise unsuitable to be worth making an RC task for them. Thundergnat seems to have a knack of finding worthwhile ones to keep the 'usual suspects' happy and I have a look myself from time to time. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 13:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Ormiston pairs (view source)