Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions
→We already know you disagree with my approach, but how do we move on ?
(→Acceptable Solutions ?: Comments written in English ?) |
|||
Line 102:
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
: Paddy I think we've already established that you disagree with my approach.
: (Those functions and function-names incidentally, are '''not''' peculiar to Haskell – they are part of a broader tradition of pure functional – i.e. mathematically based – programming. You will also find them, for example in SML, another of the languages to which the Python '''itertools''' module acknowledges a debt in the opening paragraph of its documentation. Borrowing functions and function names from that tradition is a well-established Python practice)
: All of that, however, is beside the point. We already know that you take a different approach. The question is, how to we '''handle''' differences of approach on Rosetta Code ?
: What is the solution ? (See the topic at the end of this thread for a summary of the solutions that various contributors have put to you, in the hope of some response).
: I notice that some rather dark themes are re-emerging in your discussion here. Are we now returning to the more exotic theories, perceptions and techniques which I thought you had put behind you in 2019 ?
:: See [Talk:Tree traversal - Rosetta Code]( http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Talk:Tree_traversal )
: [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
== Haskell type hints are not valid Python==
|