Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
Line 225:
:: See https://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Discouraging_approaches
:: Can you advise me one how one adds such topics to the main listing of the Village Pump page ?
:::From the look of thinks the vptopic tags stopped working properly around 2015. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Line 232:
:: I would certainly never presume to edit it directly :-)
:: (I am more than content to do the proper Rosetta thing, and just submit a constrasting variant, illustrating the possibility of another approach). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
:::It is a shame that Paddy has chosen not to respond. I agree it might not be ideal, but as that age-old saying goes: "The definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome." --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:I like the way Wren has done this creating library pages under the main language page for each category of functionality. The tasks then just need to refer to something like Task::Python::Functional::Folding etc. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
::It would be really neat if they were available via CDN so entries could be run on tio etc without additional copy/pastes. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
==Would the deletionary campaign continue if my type comments were in English ?==
| |||