Talk:Cousin primes: Difference between revisions
→task needs clarification: Responded to Gerard.
m (→task needs clarification: added wording.) |
(→task needs clarification: Responded to Gerard.) |
||
Line 25:
This also raises the question (again), '''if''' we were to (for instance) list all cousin primes less than 100, should '''97''' be shown? --- Of course it should, because it ''is'' a cousin prime; but its (higher paired) cousin prime is out of range. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
:Even though the task description was not entirely clear, I think the author's intentions are clear from his Ring solution. I've therefore taken the liberty of clarifying the task description on the main page in a way which is consistent with the existing solutions. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||