Anonymous user
Talk:Cousin primes: Difference between revisions
m
added whitespace.
m (→task needs clarification: added wording.) |
m (added whitespace.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 25:
This also raises the question (again), '''if''' we were to (for instance) list all cousin primes less than 100, should '''97''' be shown? --- Of course it should, because it ''is'' a cousin prime; but its (higher paired) cousin prime is out of range. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
:Even though the task description was not entirely clear, I think the author's intentions are clear from his Ring solution. I've therefore taken the liberty of clarifying the task description on the main page in a way which is consistent with the existing solutions. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
::Also made it "both less", matching the [[Twin_primes]] task. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 20:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
|