Jump to content

Talk:Determine if a string is collapsible: Difference between revisions

Edited previous comment as examples were in fact hard-coded.
(Added comment.)
(Edited previous comment as examples were in fact hard-coded.)
Line 19:
::: This task requirements explicitly states to use the (following) five test strings (at least),   it didn't mention any others that had to be used.   Nowhere does the task requirements require that one has to use the string(s) that were used as examples shown in the task's preamble   (but you are free to use them as well if you want, along with any others that you want).   If you are misunderstanding or misreading the task's requirements, please re-read what is in the task requirements section.   If there is a problem of understanding or interpreting the task's requirements, this is the place to work it out.   It would also help to state specifically what example(s) you think weren't used by the REXX's entry from those five specifically mentioned in the task's requirements.   Please note that the REXX example did use the five test strings as per the task's requirements.   Also, please refrain from posting your categorizations of someone else's comments,   this is becoming somewhat rash and not what I expect from people using Rosetta Code.   If anything, I was hoping that some of the concerns I raised would discussed or even addressed.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 
::::I've just had a look at it and the problem seems to be that the third example string should end with "7777888" but the corresponding example in the REXX entry ends with "77788". The 'squeezable' task has a similar discrepancy. It looks like you've entered the examples interactively which may explain why you missed it. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
9,486

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.