Jump to content

Sequence: smallest number with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions

m
Line 421:
It takes longer, afaict, to print the answers than it did to calculate them, tee hee!
{{out}}
64-bit (as shown) manages 8 more answers than 32-bit, which as per limit halts on 58: (on 32 bit the accuracy limit is 2^53, hence the result for 59, which is 2^58, getswould get printed wrong since the first /10 needed to print it rounds to the nearest 16 or so). It is quite probably perfectly accurate internally up to much higher limits, but proving/showing that is a bit of a problem, which would in turn probably be easiest to solve by simply rewriting this to use gmp/mpir.
<pre>
1->1
7,820

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.