Anonymous user
Talk:Fusc sequence: Difference between revisions
→Deletion vs variation: It ain't Pythonic.
(→Deletion vs variation: It ain't Pythonic.) |
|||
Line 24:
:: My view (perhaps you will disagree) is that this sheds useful light on why it proves empirically rewarding (lower defect rates, higher rates of code reuse, less profligate use – and unscheduled interruption – of human time) to adopt functional methods of composition (particularly including avoidance, wherever possible, of mutable variables) in Python projects. Others have clearly had the same experience – we have only to look at the significant number of books and articles on functional programming in Python.
:: That article is also evidence for the helpfulness, particularly in the case of Python, of illustrating, next to procedural examples, how one might alternatively adopt functional methods of composition, including the relegation of any mutable variables to the internals of well-tested primitives. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
:::Hi Hout, your code isn't Pythonic, therefore making it much harder to understand. It is much longer, making it more error-prone and less maintainable. Worst of all, it is trying to write Haskel in Python, when the community at large rejected those extremes.
:::I'm with user Ledrug on this
(as you know). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 11:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||