Talk:Fusc sequence: Difference between revisions
m
→Deletion vs variation
(Deletion vs variation) |
|||
Line 10:
The goal declared on the Rosetta landing page (''to aid a person with a grounding in one approach to a problem in learning another'') is better served by the usual practice of adding variants than by unnecessary deletions. Variant drafts can illustrate differing approaches and traditions, and they provide much more eloquent and useful commentary on each other than any number of words will ever do.
The quality of code is a function of its optimisation for particular contexts. In practice, qualities such as reliability, levels of code reuse, and ease of refactoring will often prove
Rosetta code does not claim, and is not equipped, to present unique and canonical versions. It is not clear that such versions could in any case exist. Issues of compliance are less subjective, and more rigorous, if deferred to the tooling. Checking Python submissions with tools like pylint and autoPep8, for example, is clearly sensible and constructive. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
|