Anonymous user
Talk:Superellipse: Difference between revisions
m
→Formulae now invisible on standard OS X browsers: address concerns about sniping.
m (→Formulae now invisible on standard OS X browsers: address concerns about sniping.) |
|||
Line 83:
:::::::::::::::::: I am little puzzled that you persist in speaking hopefully of "failing browsers" :-) No browsers are failing - they are behaving correctly. The mediaWiki software had been generating syntactically correct tags for the display of formula graphic files, but was no longer doing so after your edits, rendering the formulae invisible (yes, invisible, no need for quotes :-) to all browsers (the majority) which use the graphic file for the display of formulae. Have you heard of a large river which flows through Egypt ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Mr Hout: I was speaking of the browsers that are failing to render the text, whether it be from ill-formed HTML code or whatever reason, I wasn't laying blame on (or to) the browsers. I also was using the word "invisible" (in quotes) as that was the word you introduced. The word "invisible" suggest that the formula is there, but just can't be seen. In fact, the formulae aren't invisible, they just aren't being rendered (in the failing case), and that is why I placed the word invisible in quotes. There isn't any need to use such language (and interpreting my statements as being hopefully this or that ...), this isn't helping in solving and trying to address problem resolution, and reverting to ad hominem statements and snide criticisms like the above aren't in the spirit of Rosetta Code. Lets try to be more civil in these public forums. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
| |||