Anonymous user
Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols (view source)
Revision as of 00:57, 13 September 2014
, 9 years ago→What do you mean by "symbol"?: added some humor.
(→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments about ooRexx programs being placed somwhere not in the ooRexx language section.) |
(→What do you mean by "symbol"?: added some humor.) |
||
Line 8:
: I've added a general description of ''symbols'' to the task's requirement, I hope it's a start in the right direction (which is much better than reading my mind or viewing/decoding other examples). The phrase above ''Most computer languages do not give a technical meaning to the term "symbol" (and those that do define it give differing definitions of it), but ···'' was my guideline, knowing full well that my attempt won't fare any better than give some (vague and/or general) description or examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
::That's already a big improvement. Thanks. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 23:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
::: I suppose something like this wouldn't do? Those thingys that the what-ja-ma-call-its use for being a do-hicky for programers to use as variables? Seems clear to me. And Bob's your uncle. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
== ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more) ==
| |||