Anonymous user
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/FBSL Categorization Question: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/FBSL Categorization Question (view source)
Revision as of 10:53, 13 November 2013
, 10 years agono edit summary
m (BASIC consolidation) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32:
-- [[User:mmphosis|mmphosis]] ([[User talk:mmphosis|talk]]) 4:51, 13 November, 2013 (UTC)
: Hehe Mmphosis,
: So it '''was''' you who started that conspiracy! :) I won't reinstate my original message to you as you can still read it on your talk history page, and it was too hot-spirited anyway. My bad. :) But I do appreciate your assuming the responsibility for the mess.
: As for the BASIC's namespace, the idea seems reasonable though one should realise there are BASIC's and BASIC's. For instance, FBSL doesn't position itself as a BASIC but rather as a scripting language as is clearly stated by its name. FBSL can have a subtree of its own with separate branches for BASIC-style, assembly-style, C-style, and mixed solutions. Personally, I prefer to keep things simple and I wouldn't bloat my code with C or assembly just to spawn a window or recode a BMP into a PPM. Nor would I use OOP if I can avoid it. As long as FBSL supports it, it will always be my own prerogative which particular methods I choose. But some other user coming up here with his own solution should have a chance to upload his assembly code version too, and it only seems reasonable that they shouldn't do it in the BASIC branch of the tree.
: This was the main reason for my message that I wanted to get through with.
: Regards, --TheWatcher 10:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
| |||