Birthday problem: Difference between revisions

m
added whitespace to the task's preamble, added text description to the (;See also) link.
m (→‎{{header|Perl 6}}: Add language to template so it shows up correctly in "Needs Attention" category)
m (added whitespace to the task's preamble, added text description to the (;See also) link.)
Line 1:
{{Wikipedia pre 15 June 2009|pagename=Birthday Problem|lang=en|oldid=296054030|timedate=21:44, 12 June 2009}}
{{draft task}}
{{draft task}}[[Category:Probability and statistics]][[Category:Discrete math]]
[[Category:Discrete math]]
 
 
In [[wp:probability theory|probability theory]], the '''birthday problem''', or '''birthday [[wp:paradox|paradox]]''' This is not a paradox in the sense of leading to a [[wp:logic|logic]]al contradiction, but is called a paradox because the mathematical truth contradicts naïve [[wp:intuition (knowledge)|intuition]]: most people estimate that the chance is much lower than 50%. pertains to the [[wp:probability|probability]] that in a set of [[wp:random|random]]ly chosen people some pair of them will have the same [[wp:birthday|birthday]]. In a group of at least 23 randomly chosen people, there is more than 50% probability that some pair of them will both have been born on the same day. For 57 or more people, the probability is more than 99%, and it reaches 100% when the number of people reaches 366 (by the [[wp:pigeon hole principle|pigeon hole principle]], ignoring leap years). The mathematics behind this problem leads to a well-known cryptographic attack called the [[wp:birthday attack|birthday attack]].
 
 
;Task
Using simulation, estimate the number of independent people required in a groups before we can expect a ''better than even chance'' that at least 2 independent people in a group share a common birthday. Furthermore: Simulate and thus estimate when we can expect a ''better than even chance'' that at least 3, 4 & 5 independent people of the group share a common birthday. For simplicity assume that all of the people are alive...
 
 
;Suggestions for improvement
Line 12 ⟶ 17:
* Kudos (κῦδος) for finding the solution by proof (in a programming language) rather than by construction and simulation.
 
 
<br>
;See also
* Wolfram entry: &nbsp; {{Wolfram|Birthday|Problem}}
<br><br>