Jump to content

Talk:Suffix tree: Difference between revisions

m
try to address the missing reference message ... looks plausible in preview, let's see if it really works...
(→‎definition?: new section)
m (try to address the missing reference message ... looks plausible in preview, let's see if it really works...)
Line 10:
:* edges spell non-empty strings,
:* and all internal nodes (except perhaps the root) have at least two children.
 
:*{{citation
| last1 = Barsky | first1 = Marina
| last2 = Stege | first2 = Ulrike
| last3 = Thomo | first3 = Alex
| last4 = Upton | first4 = Chris
| contribution = A new method for indexing genomes using on-disk suffix trees
| location = New York, NY, USA
| pages = 649–658
| publisher = ACM
| title = CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
| year = 2008}}.
 
 
But this can be satisfied by a tree with only a root where each node is a unique suffix. Something is missing from this definition, and that something seems to have something to do with substrings which appear in multiple locations in the string.
6,962

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.