Revision as of 11:28, 21 May 2013 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎idiomatic?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:46, 23 May 2013 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (→‎idiomatic?) Newer edit →
Line 11: :: That said, I might've not described idiomaticity correctly. That's why it's important for you guys to review and help make it say the Right Thing. –[[User:Dkf\|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf\|talk]]) 13:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC) :: Owtz English wotz understood.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 11:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC) ::: I think I would put the priority on "simplicity" rather than on the amount of programmer experience. Neither concept is unambiguous, but I think "simplicity" is easier to reason with. That said, I think we should also note that there are different kinds of simplicity (having to do with time, space and presentation) and that the writer should use their judgement and be tolerant of other approaches. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 16:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC) ==Can I join in?==

Rosetta Code talk:Policy (view source)