Anonymous user
Talk:Permutations with repetitions: Difference between revisions
→REXX implementation limits: fixed corrupted updates. -- ~~~~
(Is the Mathematica solution correct?) |
(→REXX implementation limits: fixed corrupted updates. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 12:
For Regina REXX 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, REXX gives a SYNTAX error:
:::::: Error 12 running "C:\xxxxxx.REX", line 29: [Clause
For Regina REXX 3.6, 3.7, REXX "crashes" somewhere less than a statement length of 1932,
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
For what's it worth, I believe REXX should raise the SYNTAX condition.
[The reason I mention the older versions of Regina REXX is that Regina
<br>virtual memory for those REXX programs which use a ''lot'' of stemmed variables (possibly a
<br>memory leak), so the use of the older Regina release is forced in lieu of a fix.
For PC/REXX and Personal REXX, it depends on what the RXISA ('''SET''' environmental variable).
<br>These two REXXes either give:
:::::: Error 11 on line 29 of c:\xxxxxx.REX" Control stack full
<br>
:::::: Memory full: symbol
:::::: Error 5 on line 29 of C:\xxxxxx.REX: Machine resources exhausted
somewhere between 568 and 597 bytes.
It should be noted that most people use the maximum for the RXISA (which is 40K).
As far as I can tell,
<br>and that is probably true of CMS REXX and TSO REXX (it's been too long since I used those
<br>two flavors of REXX).
::::::::::: -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:2013 (UTC)
| |||