Jump to content

Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/G(matrix ng, continued fraction n): Difference between revisions

m
(→‎Marking as "draft": new section)
Line 12:
Also, currently:
 
* The task description uses notation [1;3,5] and [3;7] but this notation does not appear in any of the implementations (well, in some as a literal string, but it is not used for computational purposes). This is either a red herring or needs documentation. Perhaps it's a reference into some external manuscript? Or perhaps it has to do with a method for constructing continued fractions? Whatever is going on should be stated more clearly. (There's a comment above which sheds some light on this issue, but not enough.)
 
* The task description uses the notation "+ 1/2" which apparently corresponds to an "NG matrix" with a1=2, a=1, b1=0, b=2 and the notation "divided by 4" which apparently corresponds to an "NG matrix" with a1=1, a=0, b1=0, b=4. There is probably a good reason for this, but that should also be documented. Some implementations also use other "NG Matrices" but why?
6,962

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.