Jump to content

Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Dialects: Difference between revisions

removed a comment requesting clarification for which REXX was being referred to. -- ~~~~
(Where should we put modified Rexx code or references?)
(removed a comment requesting clarification for which REXX was being referred to. -- ~~~~)
Line 58:
- the Upper instruction
- /= and /== as alternatives to \= or \== (see characters below)
 
</pre>
::: I hate to interject here, but were you referring to '''ooRexx''' when stating that some 'features' were removed? If that's the case, could you add ... were removed from ooRexx (or maybe say ... not implenteded in ooRexx and/or removed from the ooRexx' standard(s). As it stands now, it sounds like the classic (original?) REXXes no longer support those 'features' listed above. [As far as I know, most classic REXXes still support a majority of those features.] Also (regarding below), what (or where) did you mean "other features were introducted..."? Were you speaking of the classic REXX standard or ooRexx? Please feel free to delete these comments as they are obtrusive and I only placed them here to clarify your point and have this in close proximity to the statements in question. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 22:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
<pre>
 
Other features were introduced '''with the ANSII standard''' created
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.