Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Dialects: Difference between revisions

added the information I thought was clearly stated. I won't REMOVE other people's comments.
m (clarified classic REXX vs o-o Rexx, added questions, added which versions of Regina allowed single-line comments. -- ~~~~)
(added the information I thought was clearly stated. I won't REMOVE other people's comments.)
Line 49:
is ooRexx.
 
Some 'features' of the original Rexx were removed '''in this grandchild (ooRexx)'''
- Use of @#$¢ as or in symbols
- a= as a short form of a=''
Line 60:
 
</pre>
::: I hate to interject here, but wherewere you referring to '''ooRexx''' when stating that some 'features' were removed? If that's the case, could you add ... were removed from ooRexx (or maybe say ... not implenteded in ooRexx and/or removed from the ooRexx' standard(s). As it stands now, it sounds like the classic (original?) REXXes no longer support those 'features' listed above. [As far as I know, most classic REXXes still support a majority of those features.] Also (regarding below), what (or where) did you mean "other features were introducted..."? Were you speaking of the classic REXX standard or ooRexx? Please feel free to delete these comments as they are obtrusive and I only placed them here to clarify your point and have this in close proximity to the statements in question. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 22:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
<pre>
 
Other features were introduced '''with the ANSII standard''' created
by a committee comprising Rexx implementers from IBM (notably the
original author, Mike Cowlishaw) and elsewhere:
Line 151:
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 21:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 21:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
----
2,295

edits