Anonymous user
Talk:First class environments: Difference between revisions
m
mistyped closure as clojure
No edit summary |
m (mistyped closure as clojure) |
||
Line 16:
:Is there any at all? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 16:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
::I can't detect any. Flyweight patterns seem to be mainly concerned about sharing data structures, not about runtime variable bindings.--[[User:Abu|Abu]] 16:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
:[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]]'s initial question was quite close. A "closure" is a combination of environment and code. AFAIK, in most languages the environment cannot be separated from a closure, and stored, retrieved and manipulated explictly. In PicoLisp it is the other way round: Environments can be constructed from normal Lisp data, and then perhaps be used to build a
== Runtime_evaluation/In_an_environment? ==
| |||