Anonymous user
Talk:RSA code: Difference between revisions
m
→Solutions are starting to diverge: + bonus pts for blocking
m (→Solutions are starting to diverge: + bonus pts for blocking) |
|||
Line 52:
::: Background on RSA
::: Dislaimer about real crypto
::: Bonus points for handling blocking
::* I'll post some code that follows your example. But it won't be until at least this evening.
:: How do we get a consensus on this? I don't like stealing a task and would like to hear from the Author. Would we create a new task and put something very visible up front in this saying something about it? Would we rename this to RSAdraftprototype or some such? Do we copy to new and mark the others incorrect? Erasmus?
:: --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
:::I think the first thing to do is create a category (or maybe categories?) for these tasks. Then mark this task with that category. Then do up some draft task pages and see if they attract interest. I think that this one can be cleaned up, later, perhaps after we have had some practice with formulating tasks related to encryption, or perhaps by the original author. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
| |||