Anonymous user
Talk:Short-circuit evaluation: Difference between revisions
m
→Why a draft task?: spelling
(→Why a draft task?: Not any more.) |
m (→Why a draft task?: spelling) |
||
Line 1:
==Why a draft task?==
A comment in [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Request_a_programming_task#Unsorted here] (look for ''shortcutting''), thought that the task would most likely not be written in a neutral manner. I've tried to write a task that allows each language, whether it has short-circuit evaluation or not, to solve the problem idiomatically. <br>
I saw the comments on the Icon solution, for example, which makes me think that the task could soon
: I removed the draft status as the examples seem to cope (another example is Pascal where some compilers have it and some do not).
| |||