Anonymous user
Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients (view source)
Revision as of 17:37, 21 February 2019
, 5 years ago→Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples: It's bad style.
(→Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples: It's bad style.) |
|||
Line 34:
::Functional coding has much less need of sequence, and even less of mutation or looping, but it does require a number of other concepts – significantly more than are needed to practise the imperative mode. The higher conceptual entry barrier of functional method has been shown to yield faster coding and lower bug counts, but can of course be a source of confusion and perhaps even irritation to those who haven't needed or wanted to cross it.
:: Can I suggest that the next time you find something puzzling or unfamiliar (Applicative functors ? Currying ? Monads ?) that in lieu of angry deletion, you experiment instead with eliciting clarity ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 16:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
: You continue to add your personal coding style that flouts established Python idioms and features hence its removal. You use personal type hinting, when Python has type hints; (and before that, had an established way of adding such information in docstrings). You add function documentation as comments instead of in a docstring. I have pointed this out to you before - I suggest you update your code generation.
: Functional programming and what you think my skill level is, is a diversion on your part; the real issue is you overriding established style for your ''personal'' convenience.
: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||