Jump to content

Talk:A+B: Difference between revisions

m
added a new talk section so as to properly move the TOC to it's proper place.
m (added a new talk section so as to properly move the TOC to it's proper place.)
Line 1:
==task elegance==
This task is pretty elegant; I suspect it could handily replace both [[User Input]] and [[User Output]]. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
==Formatting==
Line 13 ⟶ 15:
 
:: Ta! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
===Input Specification===
Line 31 ⟶ 34:
 
:: It's not clear to me what the interpretation of "input stream" would be for a system that doesn't have streams or I/O redirection. Specifically, any computer running without an operating system, such as most microcontrollers. By the way, do I have to edit in the user info, date, and so on as I have done, or is there a better way to add a comment than just clicking "edit"? --[[User:Gatmo|Gatmo]] 03:13 21 January 2014 (PDT)
 
 
===Input specification ("constraints")===
Line 40 ⟶ 44:
 
: The task specifies that we need the sum of A and B and that they are between -1000 and 1000. It does NOT specify that we should not provide the sum when they are out of this range. I believe the intent was that outside of this range the behavior of the program is unspecified. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 10:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
==Fabula?==
Line 48 ⟶ 53:
::::Thanks Kernigh for the reference. I would have thought that the Oxford English Dictionary would have an entry for Latin words in 'common' usage, so I don't feel the need to put back the mention of it in the task. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== LabVIEW ==
 
== LabVIEW ==
While LabVIEW can add numbers, I'm pretty sure that it cannot read stdin (or if it can, it's well beyond my knowledge). Should I add LabVIEW code, mark it as <nowiki>{{omit from|LabVIEW|No Stdin}}</nowiki>, or just leave it for someone else? --[[User:Crazyfirex|Crazyfirex]] 03:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 
==REXX==
 
==REXX==
Siskus: &nbsp; The REXX version 4 you flagged as ''incorrect'' is indeed correct, and it works as described and has been tested.
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.