Anonymous user
Template talk:Language: Difference between revisions
→Less functionality?
(Rearranged.) |
|||
Line 9:
What happened to the links to unimplemented tasks and examples that need attention? --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 20:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
: I put those pages in their respective language's categories, but forgot to move their sort order so they would float to the top. Consequently, you can see them listed under "R", for "Reports". The ENA listing was merged into the unimpl page, but the ENA ''category'' is a subcategory of the language category, so the ENA category already gets near-top billing. If I could easily turn the "Unimpl" page listings into categories, I would. My intent was to make the descriptive templates more succinct and less redundant. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
:: That has the effect of almost completely obscuring them. Consider Tcl, Python and Ruby (top 3 langs) -- more than 200 tasks implemented so the "{language} examples needing attention" subcategory and the "R" tasks don't even show up on the first page. Particularly for Tcl, where one has to scroll past a lot of expository information before the subcategories are displayed.
:: Also, if we're interested in newcomers picking up unimplemented tasks, we want those tasks to be easily found.
:: Clearly, I'm not in favour of the change. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 18:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||