Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Image uploads: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(piet?) |
m (reply) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm a little late with this, I suppose, but I've been dinking around with [http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet.html Piet] ([http://esolangs.org/wiki/Piet Esolangs entry]) over the past few days, and its programs are ''entirely'' images. (From the Piet page: "Piet is a programming language in which programs look like abstract paintings.") I like the language (as a toy), but it's possible (although somewhat unlikely) that the images could get... '''big'''. (Biggest one known ''so far'': [Image:http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet/pietquest.png]) |
:I'm a little late with this, I suppose, but I've been dinking around with [http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet.html Piet] ([http://esolangs.org/wiki/Piet Esolangs entry]) over the past few days, and its programs are ''entirely'' images. (From the Piet page: "Piet is a programming language in which programs look like abstract paintings.") I like the language (as a toy), but it's possible (although somewhat unlikely) that the images could get... '''big'''. (Biggest one known ''so far'': [Image:http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet/pietquest.png]) |
||
:So... What's the upper limit on images? Not "what will Mediawiki support", but "what do you consider too big?" -- [[User:Eriksiers|Erik Siers]] 17:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
:So... What's the upper limit on images? Not "what will Mediawiki support", but "what do you consider too big?" -- [[User:Eriksiers|Erik Siers]] 17:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:: I think for such images a codel size of 1 should be mandatory but apart from that it's not that large. There are certainly longer examples in other languages, even non-esoteric ones. If they get too large you can do the same as for other languages: Put it on a separate subpage. —[[User:Hypftier|Johannes Rössel]] 18:43, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |