Rosetta Code:Village Pump/FBSL Categorization Question: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/FBSL Categorization Question (view source)
Revision as of 04:53, 13 November 2013
, 10 years agoBASIC consolidation
No edit summary |
m (BASIC consolidation) |
||
Line 25:
I made a mention of this in the talk section of the Rosetta Code task (in the same day or next morning that it happened), but so far, those two language entries haven't been repaired or re-instated. To make it worse, I have at this point forgotten which task it was, but it was one of the first attempts at the consolidation/grouping of the BASIC languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 10:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
-----
I've been consolidating BASICs as I've been making contributions. I will stop doing this because it seems too error prone, and it sounds like some BASICs really have very little relation to BASIC at all. This relates to old discussions about BASIC: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:BASIC
It would be good to consolidate the very similar solutions but I imagine that would be error prone too. I repaired one of my entries where XPL0 moved, I since moved it to where it belongs alphabetically. http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Hailstone_sequence
-- [[User:mmphosis|mmphosis]] ([[User talk:mmphosis|talk]]) 4:51, 13 November, 2013 (UTC)
| |||