Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Coordination: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vptopic |
|||
|topic=Coordination |
|||
|summary=Coordinate to avoid cases where a person is working on a solution but another has been sent |
|||
}} |
|||
We should coordinate to avoid cases when a person is about to commit a finished solution but finds out one has already been sent. Kinda frustrating. [[User talk:foobie-bletch|Foobie Bletch]] 23:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
We should coordinate to avoid cases when a person is about to commit a finished solution but finds out one has already been sent. Kinda frustrating. [[User talk:foobie-bletch|Foobie Bletch]] 23:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:1. If you care, post your incomplete solution with a note you're working on it. |
:1. If you care, post your incomplete solution with a note you're working on it. |
||
Latest revision as of 17:43, 28 November 2010
Coordination
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
Summary
Coordinate to avoid cases where a person is working on a solution but another has been sent
Discussion
We should coordinate to avoid cases when a person is about to commit a finished solution but finds out one has already been sent. Kinda frustrating. Foobie Bletch 23:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- 1. If you care, post your incomplete solution with a note you're working on it.
- 2. Independent solutions can each have useful insights; figure out what they don't have in common and think about how to integrate it. This goes double for explanation rather than code.
- --Kevin Reid 23:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)