Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Commas: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "For the sake of (eg) http://www.timb.net/popular-languages.html could we remove the comma formatting on the counts of entries?<br> That is, instead of "The following 1,026 pag...")
 
(script it?)
Line 1: Line 1:
For the sake of (eg) http://www.timb.net/popular-languages.html could we remove the comma formatting on the counts of entries?<br>
For the sake of (eg) http://www.timb.net/popular-languages.html could we remove the comma formatting on the counts of entries?<br>
That is, instead of "The following 1,026 pages are in this category" make it "The following 1026 pages are in this category". --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 12:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
That is, instead of "The following 1,026 pages are in this category" make it "The following 1026 pages are in this category". --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 12:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

:It seems computer generated. Surely the generator can be updated to parse this? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 13:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:35, 14 June 2019

For the sake of (eg) http://www.timb.net/popular-languages.html could we remove the comma formatting on the counts of entries?
That is, instead of "The following 1,026 pages are in this category" make it "The following 1026 pages are in this category". --Pete Lomax (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

It seems computer generated. Surely the generator can be updated to parse this? --Paddy3118 (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)