Loops/Infinite: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
m (→‎{{header|R}}: changed 'while' to 'repeat')
m (Fixed lang tags.)
Line 2: Line 2:


=={{header|ActionScript}}==
=={{header|ActionScript}}==
<lang actionscript>
<lang actionscript>while (true) {
while (true) {
trace("SPAM");
trace("SPAM");
}</lang>
}
</lang>


=={{header|Ada}}==
=={{header|Ada}}==
Line 13: Line 11:
end loop;</lang>
end loop;</lang>
=={{header|ALGOL 68}}==
=={{header|ALGOL 68}}==
<lang algol68>DO
DO
printf($"SPAM"l$)
printf($"SPAM"l$)
OD</lang>
OD
Or the classic "dynamic halt":
Or the classic "dynamic halt":
loop x:
<lang algol68>loop x:
printf($"SPAM"l$);
printf($"SPAM"l$);
loop x
loop x</lang>


=={{header|AmigaE}}==
=={{header|AmigaE}}==
Line 63: Line 61:
=={{header|Befunge}}==
=={{header|Befunge}}==
Because the 2-D code space is toroidal, all loops are infinite unless explicitly stopped with '''@'''.
Because the 2-D code space is toroidal, all loops are infinite unless explicitly stopped with '''@'''.
55+"MAPS",,,,,
<lang befunge>55+"MAPS",,,,,</lang>


=={{header|Brainf***}}==
=={{header|Brainf***}}==
++++++++++[->++++++>++++++++>+<<<]>+++++>
<lang bf>++++++++++[->++++++>++++++++>+<<<]>+++++>
[+++.---.<.>---.+++>.<]
[+++.---.<.>---.+++>.<]</lang>


=={{header|C}}==
=={{header|C}}==
Line 78: Line 76:
=={{header|C++}}==
=={{header|C++}}==
{{trans|C}}
{{trans|C}}
<lang cpp>
<lang cpp>while (true)
std::cout << "SPAM\n";</lang>
while (true)
std::cout << "SPAM\n";
</lang>
or
or
<lang cpp>
<lang cpp>for (;;)
std::cout << "SPAM\n";</lang>
for (;;)
std::cout << "SPAM\n";
</lang>
or
or
<lang cpp>
<lang cpp>do
do
std::cout << "SPAM\n";
std::cout << "SPAM\n";
while (true);
while (true);</lang>
</lang>


=={{header|C sharp|C#}}==
=={{header|C sharp|C#}}==
Line 105: Line 97:


With tags:
With tags:
<cfloop condition = "true NEQ false">
<lang cfm><cfloop condition = "true NEQ false">
SPAM
SPAM
</cfloop>
</cfloop></lang>
With script:
With script:
<cfscript>
<lang cfm><cfscript>
while( true != false )
while( true != false )
{
{
writeOutput( "SPAM" );
writeOutput( "SPAM" );
}
}
</cfscript>
</cfscript></lang>


=={{header|Clojure}}==
=={{header|Clojure}}==
<lang clojure>(loop [] (println "SPAM") (recur))</lang>
<lang lisp>(loop [] (println "SPAM") (recur))</lang>


=={{header|Common Lisp}}==
=={{header|Common Lisp}}==
Line 142: Line 134:


=={{header|Erlang}}==
=={{header|Erlang}}==
-module (main).
<lang erlang>-module (main).
-export ([main/1]).
-export ([main/1]).

main(Any) ->
main(Any) ->
io:fwrite("SPAM~n",[]),
io:fwrite("SPAM~n",[]),
main(Any)
main(Any)</lang>


=={{header|FALSE}}==
=={{header|FALSE}}==
[1]["SPAM
<lang false>[1]["SPAM
"]#
"]#</lang>


=={{header|Forth}}==
=={{header|Forth}}==
Line 214: Line 206:


=={{header|Joy}}==
=={{header|Joy}}==
<lang joy>
<lang joy>DEFINE loop == [1] swap while.
DEFINE loop == [1] swap while.


["SPAM\n" putchars] loop.
["SPAM\n" putchars] loop.</lang>
</lang>


=={{header|Lisaac}}==
=={{header|Lisaac}}==
The "lisaac" compiler apparently doesn't like infinite loops. Using a static slot (variable) seems to be the only way to get away with "Recursivity without end (call_slot)." error.
The "lisaac" compiler apparently doesn't like infinite loops. Using a static slot (variable) seems to be the only way to get away with "Recursivity without end (call_slot)." error.
<lang Lisaac>
<lang Lisaac>- i : INTEGER;
- i : INTEGER;
i := 1;
i := 1;
{ i = 1 }.while_do {
{ i = 1 }.while_do {
"SPAM\n".print;
"SPAM\n".print;
};
};</lang>
</lang>


=={{header|Logo}}==
=={{header|Logo}}==
Line 234: Line 222:


=={{header|M4}}==
=={{header|M4}}==
<lang M4>
<lang M4>define(`spam',`SPAM
define(`spam',`SPAM
spam')
spam')
spam
spam</lang>
</lang>


=={{header|Make}}==
=={{header|Make}}==
Line 305: Line 291:


=={{header|Pop11}}==
=={{header|Pop11}}==
<lang pop11>while true do
<pre>
while true do
printf('SPAM', '%p\n');
printf('SPAM', '%p\n');
endwhile;
endwhile;</lang>
</pre>


=={{header|PowerShell}}==
=={{header|PowerShell}}==
Line 317: Line 301:


=={{header|Prolog}}==
=={{header|Prolog}}==
repeat, write('SPAM'), nl, fail.
<lang prolog>repeat, write('SPAM'), nl, fail.</lang>


=={{header|Python}}==
=={{header|Python}}==
Line 328: Line 312:
Note that the default R Gui buffers outputs before pushing them to the screen. To see this run either run in terminal mode, right click on the GUI window and deselect "Buffered Output" prior to execution, or add a call to flush.console() in the loop.
Note that the default R Gui buffers outputs before pushing them to the screen. To see this run either run in terminal mode, right click on the GUI window and deselect "Buffered Output" prior to execution, or add a call to flush.console() in the loop.


<lang R>
<lang R>repeat print("SPAM")</lang>
repeat print("SPAM")
</lang>


=={{header|Ruby}}==
=={{header|Ruby}}==
Line 349: Line 331:


=={{header|SNUSP}}==
=={{header|SNUSP}}==
@\>@\>@\>@\>++++++++++===!/ < < < < \
<lang snusp>@\>@\>@\>@\>++++++++++===!/ < < < < \
| | | \M=@@@@+@+++++# \.>.>.>.>./
| | | \M=@@@@+@+++++# \.>.>.>.>./
| | \A=@@+@@@@+++#
| | \A=@@+@@@@+++#
| \P=@@+@@+@@+++#
| \P=@@+@@+@@+++#
\S=@@+@+@@@+++#
\S=@@+@+@@@+++#</lang>


=={{header|Standard ML}}==
=={{header|Standard ML}}==
<lang ocaml>while true do
<lang sml>while true do
print "SPAM\n";</lang>
print "SPAM\n";</lang>


or
or


<lang ocaml>let
<lang sml>let
fun inf_loop () = (
fun inf_loop () = (
print "SPAM\n";
print "SPAM\n";
Line 374: Line 356:
=={{header|Transact-SQL}}==
=={{header|Transact-SQL}}==


<lang tsql>WHILE 1=1 BEGIN
<lang sql>WHILE 1=1 BEGIN
PRINT "SPAM"
PRINT "SPAM"
END</lang>
END</lang>
Line 389: Line 371:
=={{header|TI-89 BASIC}}==
=={{header|TI-89 BASIC}}==


<lang ti89b>Loop
<pre style="font-family:'TI Uni'">Loop
Disp "SPAM"
Disp "SPAM"
EndLoop</pre>
EndLoop</lang>


=={{header|UNIX Shell}}==
=={{header|UNIX Shell}}==
Line 411: Line 393:


=={{header|UnixPipes}}==
=={{header|UnixPipes}}==
<lang sh> yes SPAM</lang>
<lang bash> yes SPAM</lang>


=={{header|Unlambda}}==
=={{header|Unlambda}}==
Line 422: Line 404:


=={{header|Vedit macro language}}==
=={{header|Vedit macro language}}==
<lang vedit>
<lang vedit>while (1) {
while (1) {
Message("Spam\n")
Message("Spam\n")
}</lang>
}
</lang>
or:
or:
<lang vedit>
<lang vedit>do {
do {
Message("Spam\n")
Message("Spam\n")
} while (1)
} while (1)</lang>
</lang>
or:
or:
<lang vedit>
<lang vedit>for (;1;) {
for (;1;) {
Message("Spam\n")
Message("Spam\n")
}</lang>
}
</lang>
"Nearly infinite" loop can be done by using constant ALL (=1073741824) as repeat count:
"Nearly infinite" loop can be done by using constant ALL (=1073741824) as repeat count:
<lang vedit>
<lang vedit>Repeat (ALL) {
Repeat (ALL) {
Message("Spam\n")
Message("Spam\n")
}</lang>
}
</lang>


=={{header|Visual Basic}}==
=={{header|Visual Basic}}==

Revision as of 22:50, 20 November 2009

Task
Loops/Infinite
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.

Specifically print out "SPAM" followed by a newline in an infinite loop.

ActionScript

<lang actionscript>while (true) {

   trace("SPAM");

}</lang>

Ada

<lang ada>loop

  Put_Line("SPAM");

end loop;</lang>

ALGOL 68

<lang algol68>DO

 printf($"SPAM"l$)

OD</lang> Or the classic "dynamic halt": <lang algol68>loop x:

  printf($"SPAM"l$);

loop x</lang>

AmigaE

<lang amigae>PROC main()

 LOOP
   WriteF('SPAM')
 ENDLOOP

ENDPROC</lang>

AutoHotkey

<lang autohotkey>Loop

 MsgBox SPAM `n</lang>

AWK

<lang awk>BEGIN {

 while(1) {
   print "SPAM"
 }

}</lang>

BASIC

Works with: QuickBasic version 4.5

Old-fashioned syntax: <lang qbasic>while 1

 print "SPAM"

wend</lang>

Standard BASIC: <lang qbasic>do

 print "SPAM"

loop</lang>

Also <lang qbasic>for i = 1 to 10 step 0

 print "SPAM"

next i</lang>

With classic (minimal) BASIC, the standard way to make an infinite loop would be:

10 PRINT "SPAM"
20 GOTO 10

Befunge

Because the 2-D code space is toroidal, all loops are infinite unless explicitly stopped with @. <lang befunge>55+"MAPS",,,,,</lang>

Brainf***

<lang bf>++++++++++[->++++++>++++++++>+<<<]>+++++> [+++.---.<.>---.+++>.<]</lang>

C

<lang c>while(1) puts("SPAM\n");</lang> or <lang c> for(;;) puts("SPAM\n");</lang> or <lang c>do { puts("SPAM\n"); } while(1);</lang>

C++

Translation of: C

<lang cpp>while (true)

 std::cout << "SPAM\n";</lang>

or <lang cpp>for (;;)

 std::cout << "SPAM\n";</lang>

or <lang cpp>do

 std::cout << "SPAM\n";

while (true);</lang>

C#

<lang csharp>while (true) {

   Console.WriteLine("SPAM");

}</lang>

ColdFusion

This will result in a JRun Servlet Error and heap dump.

With tags: <lang cfm><cfloop condition = "true NEQ false">

 SPAM

</cfloop></lang> With script: <lang cfm><cfscript>

 while( true != false )
 {
   writeOutput( "SPAM" );
 }

</cfscript></lang>

Clojure

<lang lisp>(loop [] (println "SPAM") (recur))</lang>

Common Lisp

<lang lisp>(loop (write-line "SPAM"))</lang>

D

<lang d>while(true) writefln("SPAM") ;</lang> <lang d>for(;;) writefln("SPAM") ;</lang> <lang d>l: writefln("SPAM"); goto l;</lang>

E

<lang e>while (true) {

   println("SPAM")

}</lang>

<lang e>def f() {

   println("SPAM")
   f <- ()

} f <- ()</lang>

The difference between these is that in the second, other activities can be interleaved with the loop; in the first, no other processing will occur in this vat.

Erlang

<lang erlang>-module (main). -export ([main/1]).

main(Any) ->

 io:fwrite("SPAM~n",[]),
 main(Any)</lang>

FALSE

<lang false>[1]["SPAM "]#</lang>

Forth

<lang forth>: email begin ." SPAM" cr again ;</lang>

Fortran

Works with: Fortran version 90 and later

<lang fortran>DO

 WRITE(*,*) "SPAM"

END DO</lang> Although deprecated GOTO is still available <lang fortran>10 WRITE(*,*) "SPAM"

  GOTO 10</lang>

Go

<lang go>package main import "fmt" func main() { for { fmt.Printf("SPAM\n") } }</lang>

Groovy

<lang groovy>while (true) {

println 'SPAM'

}</lang>

Haskell

<lang haskell>forever (putStrLn "SPAM")</lang>

Icon

<lang icon>procedure main()

  every write(|"SPAM")

end</lang>

IDL

<lang IDL>while 1 do print,'SPAM'</lang>

J

<lang j>-@:(][ 1!:2&2@('SPAM'"_)) (^:_) 1</lang>

Alternatively,

<lang j>smoutput bind 'SPAM'^:1e99 </lang>

This implementation relies on numeric inaccuracies in IEEE floating point notation. For example, 1+1e98 is exactly equal to 1e98. That said, 1e99 iterations would still be significantly longer than the practical life of any machine anyone would care to dedicate to this task.

Java

<lang java>while(true){

  System.out.println("SPAM");

}</lang>

<lang java>for(;;){

  System.out.println("SPAM");

}</lang>

JavaScript

<lang javascript>for (;;) print("SPAM"); while (true) print("SPAM");</lang>

Joy

<lang joy>DEFINE loop == [1] swap while.

["SPAM\n" putchars] loop.</lang>

Lisaac

The "lisaac" compiler apparently doesn't like infinite loops. Using a static slot (variable) seems to be the only way to get away with "Recursivity without end (call_slot)." error. <lang Lisaac>- i : INTEGER; i := 1; { i = 1 }.while_do {

 "SPAM\n".print;

};</lang>

<lang logo>forever [print "SPAM]</lang>

M4

<lang M4>define(`spam',`SPAM spam') spam</lang>

Make

<lang make>spam:

  @echo SPAM
  $(MAKE)</lang>

MAXScript

<lang maxscript>while true do print "SPAM\n"</lang>

Metafont

<lang metafont>forever: message "SPAM"; endfor end</lang>

Modula-3

<lang modula3>LOOP

 IO.Put("SPAM\n");

END;</lang>

MOO

<lang moo>while (1)

 player:tell("SPAM");

endwhile</lang>

OCaml

<lang ocaml>while true do

 print_endline "SPAM"

done</lang>

or

<lang ocaml>let rec inf_loop() =

 print_endline "SPAM";
 inf_loop()

in inf_loop()</lang>

Seen like this it looks like the "too much functional" danger when a "while" loop looks far simpler, but the functional loop may be useful to provide data to the next loop without using mutable variable.

Octave

<lang octave>while(1)

 disp("SPAM")

endwhile</lang>

Pascal

<lang pascal>while true do

 writeln('SPAM');</lang>

Alternatively: <lang pascal>repeat

 writeln('SPAM')

until false;</lang>

Perl

<lang perl>print "SPAM\n" while 1;</lang>

Perl 6

Works with: Rakudo version #21 "Seattle"

<lang perl6>loop {

   say 'SPAM';

}</lang>

PHP

<lang php>while(1)

   echo "SPAM\n";</lang>

Pop11

<lang pop11>while true do

   printf('SPAM', '%p\n');

endwhile;</lang>

PowerShell

<lang powershell>for () {

   "SPAM"

}</lang>

Prolog

<lang prolog>repeat, write('SPAM'), nl, fail.</lang>

Python

<lang python>while 1:

  print "SPAM"</lang>

Note: one can also use: "True" or any other non-false value. In Python the following values are false: 0, "" (empty string), (,) and {} and [] (empty tuples, dictionaries or lists), None (the special object), and the False object. Any non-empty collection or string or non-zero numeric value is considered "True"

R

Note that the default R Gui buffers outputs before pushing them to the screen. To see this run either run in terminal mode, right click on the GUI window and deselect "Buffered Output" prior to execution, or add a call to flush.console() in the loop.

<lang R>repeat print("SPAM")</lang>

Ruby

<lang ruby>loop do

  puts "SPAM"

end</lang>

Scheme

<lang scheme>(do ()

   (#f)
   (display "SPAM")
   (newline))</lang>

Slate

<lang slate>[inform: 'SPAM'] loop</lang>

Smalltalk

<lang smalltalk>[ true ] whileTrue: [ 'SPAM' displayNl ]</lang>

SNUSP

<lang snusp>@\>@\>@\>@\>++++++++++===!/ < < < < \

|  |  |  \M=@@@@+@+++++# \.>.>.>.>./
|  |  \A=@@+@@@@+++#
|  \P=@@+@@+@@+++#
\S=@@+@+@@@+++#</lang>

Standard ML

<lang sml>while true do

 print "SPAM\n";</lang>

or

<lang sml>let

 fun inf_loop () = (
   print "SPAM\n";
   inf_loop ()
 )

in

 inf_loop ()

end</lang>

Seen like this it looks like the "too much functional" danger when a "while" loop looks far simpler, but the functional loop may be useful to provide data to the next loop without using mutable variable.

Transact-SQL

<lang sql>WHILE 1=1 BEGIN

PRINT "SPAM"

END</lang>

Tcl

<lang tcl>while true {

   puts SPAM

}

  1. or

for {} 1 {} {

   puts SPAM

}</lang>

TI-89 BASIC

<lang ti89b>Loop

 Disp "SPAM"

EndLoop</lang>

UNIX Shell

Works with: Bourne Shell
Works with: Korn Shell
Works with: Almquist SHell
Works with: Bourne Again SHell
Works with: Z Shell

<lang bash>while :; do echo SPAM; done</lang>

UnixPipes

<lang bash> yes SPAM</lang>

Unlambda

<lang unlambda> ``ci``s``s`kr``s``s``s``s`k.S`k.P`k.A`k.Mii</lang>

V

<lang v>true [

  'SPAM' puts

] while</lang>

Vedit macro language

<lang vedit>while (1) {

   Message("Spam\n")

}</lang> or: <lang vedit>do {

   Message("Spam\n")

} while (1)</lang> or: <lang vedit>for (;1;) {

   Message("Spam\n")

}</lang> "Nearly infinite" loop can be done by using constant ALL (=1073741824) as repeat count: <lang vedit>Repeat (ALL) {

   Message("Spam\n")

}</lang>

Visual Basic

<lang vb>Do

   Debug.Print("SPAM")

Loop</lang>

Visual Basic .NET

Platform: .NET

Works with: Visual Basic .NET version 9.0+

<lang vbnet>Do

   Console.WriteLine("SPAM")

Loop</lang>