Anonymous user
Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
m
added wording for the design goals.
mNo edit summary |
m (added wording for the design goals.) |
||
Line 1,281:
! {{anchor|REXX|[[REXX]]}} ({{anchor|REXX|[[Classic REXX]]}})
| [[dynamic programming|dynamic]], [[procedural programming|procedural]], [[functional programming|functional]]
|<!-- Standardized --> {{yes|Yes.
|<!-- Type strength --> strong
|<!-- Type safety --> safe
|<!-- Expression of types --> inferred
|<!-- Type compatibility --> nominal
|<!-- Type checking -->dynamic (but only when both comparands are numeric ''and''
|<!--
|<!-- Garbage collection -->{{optional| garbage collection is allowed (and in most cases, automatic), but not mandated}}
|<!-- Intended use -->general, application, algorithms, scripting, host/
|<!-- Design goals -->designed to make programming easier; to foster high quality programs by making writing them as simple and enjoyable as possible; designing each part of the language for people to use is more important than providing easy implementation; follows the principle of least astonishment.
|-
|