Category talk:J: Difference between revisions
m
signed →bytecode and interpreted
(bytecode vs. interpeted?) |
m (signed →bytecode and interpreted) |
||
Line 2:
I have added both "bytecode" and "interpreted" execution models to J. This is because bytecode is the available category which best describes how tacit code is represented, and interpreted is the available category which best describes how explicit code is represented in J602 (and, presumably, the upcoming versions).
--[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
== Is J esoteric? ==
| |||