Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Language template enhancements

From Rosetta Code
Language template enhancements
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.


Adding features to {{language}}[[Summary::Adding features to {{language}}| ]]


What kinds of things would be useful to add to the language template? Official website? Largest IRC support channel? --Short Circuit 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Official website would be cool. You should use named arguments when you add these things. --Mwn3d 03:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
How about "syntax highlighting tag" so that we can standardize unimplemented languages and let people know what to use for supported ones? --Mwn3d 22:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Language template beta

I created Template:Language_beta, so folks can experiment with the language template and make it better. Make changes and additions there, and we'll move over whatever works well over to the main template. Think of the beta template as a staging ground for ideas and features, to see what works well.

Don't be obsessed with keeping information in the language template confined to the boxes on the right; If it warrants space in the main body of the page, put it there. The idea is to come up with way of uniformly presenting all types of information that should be available for any given language.

Don't be terrified of including templates within templates, either. If there's a segment or section you want to add to the language template, create a template for that particular section, and do any additional nesting you might need in that template. If it makes the information easier to organize and edit, that's not a problem. But don't go overboard; If the maintenance of the segment is a pain because of deeply nested templates, it will eventually have to be removed or replaced when a change needs to be made.--Short Circuit 02:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Language template wishlist

  • Official site
  • Appropriate HOPL link (There's already a HOPL link, but most RC template links don't take you where you would have wanted to go.)
  • Ancillary/support sites, forums and appropriate newsgroups
  • Helpful literature (I'm hoping to help fund RC's server and service expenses based referral/affiliate links, so be aware that this might get changed to that purpose.)
  • Language tag (If someone has a good idea how to do this, I'm all ears. It's non-trivial to map backwards from a language name to the appropriate GeSHi language file, as some languages have duplicate files, and most languages on Rosetta Code aren't supported at all.)
    • The simplest solution would be to just have an optional list of language tags passed as optional template argument. That is, you could e.g. include the template in the Java category as {{language|java, java5}}, and the result would be that a line "Language tags: java, java5" appeared in the box. --Ce 07:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
These can mostly be done with named parameters. The official site and language tags would be easiest. After all the parameters are passed in they can be added to a more spiffy looking div box with <small> text showing all of the parameters like this:

Language name

Text about the language.

Official site: link
Type checking: static/dynamic
Garbage collected: yes/no
Lang tags: option1, option2
More features...

They could all be conditional. The language template code will probably look ugly, but the div box will look sweet.--Mwn3d 15:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
I put the idea into the language beta template with test values. Check it out. --Mwn3d 17:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


I just added Template:Cite which could be used for citations in anything, but in particular I wanted to use it for citations in language template parameters. I'm thinking about adding "expresscite", "gccite", and other similar (optional) parameters to the template to allow people to link to their sources right next to the information. I'm worried that it will not be used much and that the language template is blowing up now. Thoughts? --Mwn3d 17:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the template "blowing up," What about structuring Template:Language in a fashion similar to Template:mylang? That would allow the addition of arbitrary key-value pairs with a basic member template, and more specific ones for specialized keys like standards, paradigms, presence of garbage collection, etc. I'll admit I don't muck with the template's parameters much because I find the ParserFunctions code generally daunting. Breaking that apart would make it easier to add/remove components to the description block. --Michael Mol 19:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I created Template:Language/Start, Template:Language/End, Template:Language/Property/Generic and Template:Language/Property/URL. Obviously, that doesn't come close to representing the full set of features that Template:Language currently manages, but it's a start, it may be easier to use, and it's easily extensible. Thoughts? --Michael Mol 04:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)