User talk:Wherrera: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(Palindromic gapful numbers Digit 9 of 1,000,000 wrong)
Line 13: Line 13:


Yes, I found out how to do it in CoffeeScript. But Nim will be harder as it lacks run time eval. eval is available only for compile time. I think it should be possible to enter new molecules without having to recompile. So, I guess, an interpreted language is needed.
Yes, I found out how to do it in CoffeeScript. But Nim will be harder as it lacks run time eval. eval is available only for compile time. I think it should be possible to enter new molecules without having to recompile. So, I guess, an interpreted language is needed.

Also, regexes seem to have very different apis between languages. They seem to be as quick as handwritten parsing, though. --[[User:ChristerNilsson|ChristerNilsson]] ([[User talk:ChristerNilsson|talk]]) 01:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Also, regexes seem to have very different apis between languages. They seem to be as quick as handwritten parsing, though. --[[User:ChristerNilsson|ChristerNilsson]] ([[User talk:ChristerNilsson|talk]]) 01:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

== Your example for [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Palindromic_gapful_numbers#Julia Palindromic gapful numbers] ==
has wrong output for 1,000,000 for digit 9.Maybe there is an Int64 overflow 91,189,796,469,798,119 = 9.1E16 [[User:Horst.h|Horst.h]] ([[User talk:Horst.h|talk]]) 10:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)