Anonymous user
User talk:Walterpachl: Difference between revisions
→Long examples: editing expected..
(→Long examples: it's the wiki way.) |
(→Long examples: editing expected..) |
||
Line 56:
::: There is very little that is written down about the way RC and other wiki's work. It is left mainly to peoples reasonable consensus and following what works elsewhere. In this case it comes from wikipedias practice of not signing entries but signing all talk page entries. It has the effect of emphasizing that not only is the task and its entries a collaborative effort, but also encourages others to improve any code submitted. Signing code is like saying "This is mine. Do not touch". As soon as anyone were to change something then a name in comments would not match reality. Given the way that wiki's encourage improvement, using history to determine who wrote what is the most accurate way of determining something that is not often needed. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 08:34, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
::: if you submit code to a wiki such as this then you should understand that improving such examples by the community is normal and to be expected. It may be a little hard to let go at first, but a lot of people, me included, learn a lot by understanding others viewpoints --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 08:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
| |||