User talk:Walterpachl: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Discussion moved from task page: Just my opinion...) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::: Just my opinion: if there is an answer there already that gets flagged as being incomplete and then a complete answer comes along that is longer, more complex, and fails to showcase the language then you might argue to append the wrong answer with an explanation of what it misses out and why it should be kept. But we '''really''' try and stick to the task description so a reason for keeping should be strong. |
:::: Just my opinion: if there is an answer there already that gets flagged as being incomplete and then a complete answer comes along that is longer, more complex, and fails to showcase the language then you might argue to append the wrong answer with an explanation of what it misses out and why it should be kept. But we '''really''' try and stick to the task description so a reason for keeping should be strong. |
||
:::: An example if this is where [[Talk:Range_extraction#TUSCRIPT_example|I asked for an example to be preserved]] in the Range Expansion task as a language had a large part of the spec in-built. They seem to have kept both examples which is great, but I can't think of another example off-hand. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC) |
:::: An example if this is where [[Talk:Range_extraction#TUSCRIPT_example|I asked for an example to be preserved]] in the Range Expansion task as a language had a large part of the spec in-built. They seem to have kept both examples which is great, but I can't think of another example off-hand. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
== "Herzliches Dankeschön" for correcting the errors on Collections == |
|||
--[[User:Siskus|Siskus]] ([[User talk:Siskus|talk]]) 11:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||