User talk:Waldorf: Difference between revisions
→Primitive types: new section
(→Primitive types: new section) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 31:
Cheers [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 02:59, 16 February 2008 (MST)
:I gather from your example above that you are suggesting the use of an unsigned integer type. I use a Windows XP OS. The largest unsigned number available to me on my Ada compiler is a 64 bit unsigned number, which yields the same result.--[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 07:02, 16 February 2008 (MST)
== [[Monty Hall simulation]] results ==
Hi, Your sample results could be in error could you take a look at the comment in the MH talk page please, thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
:The problem was handled by increasing the number of iterations. The discrete random number generator in the GNAT compiler is flaky for small numbers of runs.--[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 00:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
== Primitive types ==
There's some interest in the intention behind [[Talk:Defining Primitive Data Types|Defining Primitive Types]], if you can take a moment to weigh in. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 02:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||