User talk:Thundergnat: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→moving of REXX routines: Nope. Not checking.) |
m (→moving of REXX routines: added a congrats type of thingy.) |
||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
:Nope. I am not changing the ''location'' just the ''classification''. If you go to the [[REXX]] page and look under subcategories you'll see the link for [[:Category:REXX_library_routines]]. Now they are all identified as to what they are so they are not as likely to be deleted as 'orphaned' or 'unused' and have a centralized link index for easy access, but are still at the same address so previous links still work the same. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 00:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
:Nope. I am not changing the ''location'' just the ''classification''. If you go to the [[REXX]] page and look under subcategories you'll see the link for [[:Category:REXX_library_routines]]. Now they are all identified as to what they are so they are not as likely to be deleted as 'orphaned' or 'unused' and have a centralized link index for easy access, but are still at the same address so previous links still work the same. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 00:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
:: Thanks for all your time and work. I checked a few of the Rosetta Code pages that used the links, and they all work. I'm not sure which one of my REXX entries that previously failed, but I will try to hunt that one down and check it out. Also, I think the wording you added was very succinct and perfectly stated (about why the REXX routines where stored this way and such). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||