User talk:Siskus: Difference between revisions
→Annoying REXX contributors: Banned.
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→Annoying REXX contributors: the missing answer to an open 'question') |
(→Annoying REXX contributors: Banned.) |
||
Line 13:
Have fun.
--[[User:Siskus|Siskus]] ([[User talk:Siskus|talk]]) 20:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
: Yes, some users on Rosetta Code have ongoing(!) difficulties with wiki formatting and, occasionally, ettiquette. They are not, however, habitually rude or obnoxious. They have also not insulted other users' wiki ettiquette while at the same time showing a total lack of respect for other users, their langauges and their code. You had one warning already. Because I simply don't have time to deal with the barrage of complaints I get about you (despite the complaintant's curteously acknowledging my lack of time and clearly extended execution of patience), and because you didn't seem to get the message the first time I banned you, I'm banning you again. This time, for one month. This *is* your final warning; if I have to ban you again for any reason, it will not be a temporary ban. Congratulations would be in order, too; in the seven-year history of this wiki, you would be only the second non-spammer I'd have ever felt the need to perma-ban. Please shape up. This wiki is fundamentally built on cooperation, congeniality and respect. If you cannot manage to imbue those attributes most of the time, or at least fake them, then there will be no place for you here. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] ([[User talk:Short Circuit|talk]]) 22:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
:: As for me I am truly shocked and appaled by this unbelievable reaction!
| |||