User talk:Siskus: Difference between revisions

Line 135:

==Adding: "Category:Scala examples needing attention" to task examples==

Hi Siskus. We tend not to add the category in that way as you have left no comment on what is deficient in the current code. It would be better to mark an example as incomplete or incprrect as those templates allow a reason for their use to be added and displayed whith the offending example. Thanks, --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 13:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

==marking REXX entries as novice==

Hi Siskus:   Please refrain from marking descriptions in REXX entries as "novice" and let people more familiar with the REXX programming language pass judgement on whether or not it was entered by a novice.   I've been noticing that you are sniping at various REXX programming language entries and have never responded to any queries by me or others concerning your inflammatory and sometime destructive behavior regarding said language.   If you could be more specific in your comments and justify your actions instead of just flagging some REXX entries in a capricious manner, including marking numerous REXX entries as '''omit''' even though there was an existing REXX solution.   Marking a language as/for '''omit''' when there is already a solution entered or marking it as such when one doesn't know the capability of a language is just inappropriate.   I know the REXX programming language very well and I would never mark any task as inappropriate for the REXX language, there are always programmers that can find a solution to most tasks.   I certainly wouldn't mark a programming language as '''omit''' when I barely know the language. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)