User talk:PureFox: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→agreeing statistics: added a new talk section.) |
(→agreeing statistics: Replied to Gerard.) |
||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
== agreeing statistics == |
== agreeing statistics == |
||
I quite relieved that our numbers (totals) match concerning the Rosetta Code task "Fraction reduction". I was afraid that my code may have missed something and I'd have to re-examine the REXX code to see what is causing the difference. I know the "five-digit" fractions took my program a wee bit of time to complete, that is why I made it an optional part of the task. I don't think I'll try to complete the "six-digit" fractions, but I'm hoping that somebody will try. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC) |
I quite relieved that our numbers (totals) match concerning the Rosetta Code task "Fraction reduction". I was afraid that my code may have missed something and I'd have to re-examine the REXX code to see what is causing the difference. I know the "five-digit" fractions took my program a wee bit of time to complete, that is why I made it an optional part of the task. I don't think I'll try to complete the "six-digit" fractions, but I'm hoping that somebody will try. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, I'm relieved as well as it's so easy to make a blunder with this kind of task! I have some ideas about quickening up the Go solution but it will need to be considerably faster to be worthwhile tackling the six-digit fractions. Thanks for posting another interesting task. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC) |