Anonymous user
User talk:Nigel Galloway: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==15 puzzle solver==
It is not obvious the code you've submitted always detects a shortest possible solution; would you please provide any proofs or references?--[[User:Chmykh|Chmykh]] ([[User talk:Chmykh|talk]]) 16:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
==regarding Execute Ramsey Mathprog==
In re [[Execute Ramsey Mathprog]]; what were you trying to achieve with that? What language were you writing in? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 13:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
==Anti primes:F#==
==Sub-headings in task language examples==▼
Please leave the note until it is fixed.
Please reserve subheadings for alternate full example programs in tasks and use bold for sub-headings within tasks as is seen in many RC tasks. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 12:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)▼
----
==Please restore the original EKG sequence task description==
Line 84 ⟶ 89:
::Compromise? You must decide what calculate means. If it means calculate, then you should specify the equation you want to use to calculate the correct value in steps 1 and 3 which must simply be verified in steps 2 and 4. You should then stick a silly note on just about every solution. If it is acceptable to provide candidates to the verification procedure until a correct solution is found, then I see no reason to consider my solution less worthy than any other (actually I think it's better than any other) and you should remove your silly note from my solution.
--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
▲==Sub-headings in task language examples==
▲Please reserve subheadings for alternate full example programs in tasks and use bold for sub-headings within tasks as is seen in many RC tasks. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 12:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
| |||