Anonymous user
User talk:Mwn3d: Difference between revisions
→Template:Language/Start and friends
(→Template:Language/Start and friends: new section) |
|||
Line 61:
What was wrong with the way they were implemented? I don't remember them looking broken when I left off with them last night; all that was left was implementing templates akin to [[Template:Language/Property/Generic]] and [[Template:Language/Property/URL]] for more specific things like BNF, HOPL, exec, site, gc, parampass, safety, strength, compat, express, checking, lang and lct. The more specific forms are useful because we can check against their absence or omittence akin to langauge/tasks, and put them as maintenance items in [[Template:Unimpl_Page]]. I'm also trying to get away from using parserfunctions so much; it makes some templates more difficult to maintain, IMHO. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 04:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
:When I tried them out in [[Template:Language beta]] I got <nowiki>|}</nowiki> showing up sometimes and other times I had tables that never ended. When I moved things around to the way they are now it ended up looking right. So do you want a new template for every parameter? That doesn't seem practical. Also I don't really like the way the naming is going. It's getting too long too fast. I'm not sure what naming scheme would be better. If we want to check anything we will have to use parser functions. I guess I wasn't around to see the plan for this craziness. Was there a plan discussed or did I just go forward with the idea too quickly? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 04:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||