User talk:MikeMol: Difference between revisions
Cyberbullying
(Respectful behavior toward other users, and towards this site) |
(Cyberbullying) |
||
Line 35:
* [[User talk:Short Circuit/Stats]]
= Put new stuff below here =
==Cyberbullying==
===Legal definition===
<pre>
Cyberbullying is defined in legal glossaries as
actions that use information and communication technologies to support deliberate,
repeated, and hostile behavior by an individual or group, that is intended to harm
another or others.
use of communication technologies for the intention of harming another person
use of internet service and mobile technologies such as web pages and discussion groups
as well as instant messaging or SMS text messaging with the intention of harming another
person.
Examples of what constitutes cyberbullying include communications that seek to intimidate,
control, manipulate, put down, falsely discredit, or humiliate the recipient. The actions
are deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior intended to harm another. Cyberbullying has
been defined by The National Crime Prevention Council: “when the Internet, cell phones or
other devices are used to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another
person.
A cyberbully may be a person whom the target knows or an online stranger. A cyberbully may be
anonymous and may solicit involvement of other people online who do not even know the target.
</pre>
Michael I believe that the posts from http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Talk:Arithmetic-geometric_mean to Talk:Kaprekar by ledrug and Hignight constitute communications that seek to intimidate, control, manipulate, put down, falsely discredit, or humiliate me. The actions are deliberate, repeated, and hostile towards me. How else am I to interpret:
<pre>
I'll make a few comments, but won't discuss it any more after that, since that would be
obviously futile.
I don't know what kind of antique lisp machine you have installed in your basement, but
your code does not compile on either SBCL or Clisp. Maybe geniuses shan't be bothered by such
trifles.
Your code, once made compile with SBCL (change that do (...) () to do (...) (nil), does
exactly the samething mathematically: raise a power of a base repeately, until either it
splits the square of n with the right sum, or it's too large. Except you are doing it in a
convoluted way, using non-integer methods on integers, and ends up with something literally
100 times slower then my edit you reverted (on SBCL that is, I don't know about your antique
lisp machine).
You had one good idea of checking congruence, and a whole lot of terrible ones: being
thoughtless in dealing with datatypes (pow and log on integers in C++, / and floor in Lisp);
being sloppy in performance tuning (your "v.fast" C++ code isn't all that fast); being
vengeful (paddy_cnt?); being narcissistic (own name as variable?); being inconsiderate to
code readers (what kind of person posts unindented Lisp?); and generally being an all-around
dick.
Your sarcasm in the lisp code was neither subtle nor funny. You give British humor a bad
name.
You are probably not stupid, but it's safe to say you are not the smartest person on RC, by a
long shot. And smart people around here tend to have good manners, unlike you or I. Stop
treating yourself like you are the one true genius, and try to do something that's helpful to
people instead of showing off, OK? (my guess: probably not. Oh well.) --Ledrug 00:10, 4
October 2012 (UTC)
Well said. He is clearly more interested in being a pompous dick then contributing
quality code to RC. --Larry Hignight 08:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
</pre>
I believe that the following:
<pre>
I'm sure that Nigel will respond to these results in his usual manner: "that is hot air",
"all of your implementations are flawed; Mine is the only true Common Lisp", "Surely, you
must have my version and Ledrug's version mixed up", or even the classic "Why didn't you just
fix my code!" Who knows... I'm sure that it will be amusing though. Therefore, I encourage
everyone with a working CL implementation to attempt to compile both versions and post your
results. --Larry Hignight 07:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
</pre>
consitutes an attempt "to solicit involvement of other people online who do not even know the target."
--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:35, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
==Respectful behavior toward other users, and towards this site==
Michael I would ask you to reread the Talk:Kaprekar_numbers page.
| |||