User talk:MikeMol: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→No code colourization at present?: Local problem, sorry. |
Respectful behavior toward other users, and towards this site |
||
Line 35:
* [[User talk:Short Circuit/Stats]]
= Put new stuff below here =
==Respectful behavior toward other users, and towards this site==
Michael I would ask you to reread the Talk:Kaprekar_numbers page.
:*The comment "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" was posted by ledrug not me, you are wrong in fact.
:*Secondly the comment "A lot of hot air for somthing that doesn't exist! I did not break the origional solution, I made it solve the task" is in response to a long list of reasons why he feels his lisp style is better than mine, followed by "Yeah, it's kind of a shame that someone broke it though. --Larry Hignight 22:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC). Hignight maintains I broke his solution I did not. The proof is in the sample output showing it working (now lost to history). I had no problem with him undoing the changes. I have no wish to discuss my lisp style in a program which was not well written in the first place and had anyway been replaced by ledrug.
:*Thirdly, when have I been asked to sign my posts before? I usually do, and if I don't it is merely by accident as any reasonable person would think.
:*Fourthly I refer you to ledrugs comments on http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Talk:Arithmetic-geometric_mean "That was one of the most amazing paragraph to have ever graced RC, where except the first and the last, every sentence is wrong to some extent, and it was written sincerely (as far as I can tell).", and tell me how my response "Thank you for your interest, but why so angry?" can be considered agressive in any way to what is a very agressive posting from ledrug. Again in response to the bile posted on the Kaprekar page by ledrug starting "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" and finishing "You are probably not stupid, but it's safe to say you are not the smartest person on RC, by a long shot. And smart people around here tend to have good manners, unlike you or I. Stop treating yourself like you are the one true genius" "I responded "Again ledrug why so angry? I didn't revert your edit, it is a good solution, I left it there and reinstated my solution which you deleted, as, indeed, it was you who deleted Larry's solution". Again how is that aggresive?
In conclusion please reread the postings on the Talk:Kaprekar page understanding that you were mistaken in your understanding that I wrote "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" and explain to me how my response to ledrug's bile has been aggressive. He continually posts comments questioning my sincerity, I insist that you clarify that you for Rosetta Code do not support that contention.
As we seem to agree that "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" is agressive, it only remains for you to convince yourself that its authorship is ledreg for you to address your critism where it belongs.
--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
==How can I efficiently find out the author of a solution?==
browsing the history is cumbersome
| |||